Swift Package IndexBuild Information
Failed to build Pooling, reference master (a242c7), with Swift 6.1 for Linux on 25 Apr 2025 07:28:43 UTC.
Build Command
bash -c docker run --pull=always --rm -v "checkouts-4606859-2":/host -w "$PWD" registry.gitlab.com/finestructure/spi-images:basic-6.1-latest swift build --triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu 2>&1Build Log
========================================
RunAll
========================================
Builder version: 4.61.0
Interrupt handler set up.
========================================
Checkout
========================================
Clone URL: https://github.com/gitvalue/Pooling.git
Reference: master
Initialized empty Git repository in /host/spi-builder-workspace/.git/
hint: Using 'master' as the name for the initial branch. This default branch name
hint: is subject to change. To configure the initial branch name to use in all
hint: of your new repositories, which will suppress this warning, call:
hint:
hint: git config --global init.defaultBranch <name>
hint:
hint: Names commonly chosen instead of 'master' are 'main', 'trunk' and
hint: 'development'. The just-created branch can be renamed via this command:
hint:
hint: git branch -m <name>
From https://github.com/gitvalue/Pooling
* branch master -> FETCH_HEAD
* [new branch] master -> origin/master
HEAD is now at a242c7e Released version 1.0.1
Cloned https://github.com/gitvalue/Pooling.git
Revision (git rev-parse @):
a242c7e708f7e82c4f299e8f63218773f60c53d7
SUCCESS checkout https://github.com/gitvalue/Pooling.git at master
========================================
Build
========================================
Selected platform: linux
Swift version: 6.1
Building package at path: $PWD
https://github.com/gitvalue/Pooling.git
https://github.com/gitvalue/Pooling.git
WARNING: environment variable SUPPRESS_SWIFT_6_FLAGS is not set
{
"dependencies" : [
],
"manifest_display_name" : "Pooling",
"name" : "Pooling",
"path" : "/host/spi-builder-workspace",
"platforms" : [
],
"products" : [
{
"name" : "Pooling",
"targets" : [
"Pooling"
],
"type" : {
"library" : [
"automatic"
]
}
}
],
"targets" : [
{
"c99name" : "PoolingTests",
"module_type" : "SwiftTarget",
"name" : "PoolingTests",
"path" : "Tests/PoolingTests",
"sources" : [
"PoolingTests.swift"
],
"target_dependencies" : [
"Pooling"
],
"type" : "test"
},
{
"c99name" : "Pooling",
"module_type" : "SwiftTarget",
"name" : "Pooling",
"path" : "Sources/Pooling",
"product_memberships" : [
"Pooling"
],
"sources" : [
"PThreadMutex.swift",
"Pool.swift",
"Pooling.swift"
],
"type" : "library"
}
],
"tools_version" : "4.0"
}
Running build ...
bash -c docker run --pull=always --rm -v "checkouts-4606859-2":/host -w "$PWD" registry.gitlab.com/finestructure/spi-images:basic-6.1-latest swift build --triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -Xswiftc -Xfrontend -Xswiftc -stats-output-dir -Xswiftc -Xfrontend -Xswiftc .stats -Xswiftc -strict-concurrency=complete -Xswiftc -enable-upcoming-feature -Xswiftc StrictConcurrency -Xswiftc -enable-upcoming-feature -Xswiftc DisableOutwardActorInference -Xswiftc -enable-upcoming-feature -Xswiftc GlobalActorIsolatedTypesUsability -Xswiftc -enable-upcoming-feature -Xswiftc InferSendableFromCaptures 2>&1
basic-6.1-latest: Pulling from finestructure/spi-images
8f84a9f2102e: Pulling fs layer
ee623408e42c: Pulling fs layer
653e3d1c2caf: Pulling fs layer
fdf5c28c51a4: Pulling fs layer
220a2f2245bd: Pulling fs layer
94962c4d92f3: Pulling fs layer
fdf5c28c51a4: Waiting
220a2f2245bd: Waiting
94962c4d92f3: Waiting
8f84a9f2102e: Verifying Checksum
8f84a9f2102e: Download complete
fdf5c28c51a4: Verifying Checksum
fdf5c28c51a4: Download complete
8f84a9f2102e: Pull complete
ee623408e42c: Verifying Checksum
ee623408e42c: Download complete
94962c4d92f3: Verifying Checksum
94962c4d92f3: Download complete
220a2f2245bd: Verifying Checksum
220a2f2245bd: Download complete
653e3d1c2caf: Verifying Checksum
653e3d1c2caf: Download complete
ee623408e42c: Pull complete
653e3d1c2caf: Pull complete
fdf5c28c51a4: Pull complete
220a2f2245bd: Pull complete
94962c4d92f3: Pull complete
Digest: sha256:3bdcac04179f4ed3e5b8e9dbd6e74bbf5ebc0f4fde48bbaad7d1e5c757e65bcb
Status: Downloaded newer image for registry.gitlab.com/finestructure/spi-images:basic-6.1-latest
Building for debugging...
[0/2] Write sources
[1/2] Write swift-version-24593BA9C3E375BF.txt
[3/6] Compiling Pooling Pooling.swift
[4/6] Compiling Pooling Pool.swift
error: emit-module command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
[5/6] Emitting module Pooling
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:123:39: error: cannot find type 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
121 | @available(OSX 10.12, iOS 10, *)
122 | public final class UnfairLock: RawMutex {
123 | public typealias MutexPrimitive = os_unfair_lock
| `- error: cannot find type 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
124 |
125 | public init() {
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:129:30: error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
127 |
128 | /// Exposed as an "unsafe" public property so non-scoped patterns can be implemented, if required.
129 | public var unsafeMutex = os_unfair_lock()
| `- error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
130 |
131 | public func unbalancedLock() {
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:122:20: error: type 'UnfairLock' does not conform to protocol 'RawMutex'
30 | /// A more specific kind of mutex that assume an underlying primitive and unbalanced lock/trylock/unlock operators
31 | public protocol RawMutex: ScopedMutex {
32 | associatedtype MutexPrimitive
| `- note: protocol requires nested type 'MutexPrimitive'
33 |
34 | /// The raw primitive is exposed as an "unsafe" public property for faster access in some cases
:
120 | /// NOTE: due to the behavior of the lock (non-FIFO) a single thread might drop and reacquire the lock without giving waiting threads a chance to resume (leading to potential starvation of waiters). For this reason, it is only recommended in situations where contention is expected to be rare or the interaction between contenders is otherwise known.
121 | @available(OSX 10.12, iOS 10, *)
122 | public final class UnfairLock: RawMutex {
| |- error: type 'UnfairLock' does not conform to protocol 'RawMutex'
| `- note: add stubs for conformance
123 | public typealias MutexPrimitive = os_unfair_lock
124 |
[6/6] Compiling Pooling PThreadMutex.swift
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:123:39: error: cannot find type 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
121 | @available(OSX 10.12, iOS 10, *)
122 | public final class UnfairLock: RawMutex {
123 | public typealias MutexPrimitive = os_unfair_lock
| `- error: cannot find type 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
124 |
125 | public init() {
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:129:30: error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
127 |
128 | /// Exposed as an "unsafe" public property so non-scoped patterns can be implemented, if required.
129 | public var unsafeMutex = os_unfair_lock()
| `- error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
130 |
131 | public func unbalancedLock() {
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:122:20: error: type 'UnfairLock' does not conform to protocol 'RawMutex'
30 | /// A more specific kind of mutex that assume an underlying primitive and unbalanced lock/trylock/unlock operators
31 | public protocol RawMutex: ScopedMutex {
32 | associatedtype MutexPrimitive
| `- note: protocol requires nested type 'MutexPrimitive'
33 |
34 | /// The raw primitive is exposed as an "unsafe" public property for faster access in some cases
:
120 | /// NOTE: due to the behavior of the lock (non-FIFO) a single thread might drop and reacquire the lock without giving waiting threads a chance to resume (leading to potential starvation of waiters). For this reason, it is only recommended in situations where contention is expected to be rare or the interaction between contenders is otherwise known.
121 | @available(OSX 10.12, iOS 10, *)
122 | public final class UnfairLock: RawMutex {
| |- error: type 'UnfairLock' does not conform to protocol 'RawMutex'
| `- note: add stubs for conformance
123 | public typealias MutexPrimitive = os_unfair_lock
124 |
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:93:46: error: cannot convert value of type 'Int' to expected argument type 'Int32'
91 | switch type {
92 | case .normal:
93 | pthread_mutexattr_settype(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL)
| `- error: cannot convert value of type 'Int' to expected argument type 'Int32'
94 | case .recursive:
95 | pthread_mutexattr_settype(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE)
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:95:46: error: cannot convert value of type 'Int' to expected argument type 'Int32'
93 | pthread_mutexattr_settype(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL)
94 | case .recursive:
95 | pthread_mutexattr_settype(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE)
| `- error: cannot convert value of type 'Int' to expected argument type 'Int32'
96 | }
97 | guard pthread_mutex_init(&unsafeMutex, &attr) == 0 else {
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:132:9: error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_lock' in scope
130 |
131 | public func unbalancedLock() {
132 | os_unfair_lock_lock(&unsafeMutex)
| `- error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_lock' in scope
133 | }
134 |
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:136:16: error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_trylock' in scope
134 |
135 | public func unbalancedTryLock() -> Bool {
136 | return os_unfair_lock_trylock(&unsafeMutex)
| `- error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_trylock' in scope
137 | }
138 |
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:140:9: error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_unlock' in scope
138 |
139 | public func unbalancedUnlock() {
140 | os_unfair_lock_unlock(&unsafeMutex)
| `- error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_unlock' in scope
141 | }
142 | }
Running build ...
bash -c docker run --pull=always --rm -v "checkouts-4606859-2":/host -w "$PWD" registry.gitlab.com/finestructure/spi-images:basic-6.1-latest swift build --triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu 2>&1
basic-6.1-latest: Pulling from finestructure/spi-images
Digest: sha256:3bdcac04179f4ed3e5b8e9dbd6e74bbf5ebc0f4fde48bbaad7d1e5c757e65bcb
Status: Image is up to date for registry.gitlab.com/finestructure/spi-images:basic-6.1-latest
[0/1] Planning build
Building for debugging...
[0/1] Write swift-version-24593BA9C3E375BF.txt
[2/5] Compiling Pooling Pooling.swift
error: emit-module command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
[3/5] Compiling Pooling Pool.swift
[4/5] Emitting module Pooling
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:123:39: error: cannot find type 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
121 | @available(OSX 10.12, iOS 10, *)
122 | public final class UnfairLock: RawMutex {
123 | public typealias MutexPrimitive = os_unfair_lock
| `- error: cannot find type 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
124 |
125 | public init() {
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:129:30: error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
127 |
128 | /// Exposed as an "unsafe" public property so non-scoped patterns can be implemented, if required.
129 | public var unsafeMutex = os_unfair_lock()
| `- error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
130 |
131 | public func unbalancedLock() {
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:122:20: error: type 'UnfairLock' does not conform to protocol 'RawMutex'
30 | /// A more specific kind of mutex that assume an underlying primitive and unbalanced lock/trylock/unlock operators
31 | public protocol RawMutex: ScopedMutex {
32 | associatedtype MutexPrimitive
| `- note: protocol requires nested type 'MutexPrimitive'
33 |
34 | /// The raw primitive is exposed as an "unsafe" public property for faster access in some cases
:
120 | /// NOTE: due to the behavior of the lock (non-FIFO) a single thread might drop and reacquire the lock without giving waiting threads a chance to resume (leading to potential starvation of waiters). For this reason, it is only recommended in situations where contention is expected to be rare or the interaction between contenders is otherwise known.
121 | @available(OSX 10.12, iOS 10, *)
122 | public final class UnfairLock: RawMutex {
| |- error: type 'UnfairLock' does not conform to protocol 'RawMutex'
| `- note: add stubs for conformance
123 | public typealias MutexPrimitive = os_unfair_lock
124 |
[5/5] Compiling Pooling PThreadMutex.swift
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:123:39: error: cannot find type 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
121 | @available(OSX 10.12, iOS 10, *)
122 | public final class UnfairLock: RawMutex {
123 | public typealias MutexPrimitive = os_unfair_lock
| `- error: cannot find type 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
124 |
125 | public init() {
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:129:30: error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
127 |
128 | /// Exposed as an "unsafe" public property so non-scoped patterns can be implemented, if required.
129 | public var unsafeMutex = os_unfair_lock()
| `- error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock' in scope
130 |
131 | public func unbalancedLock() {
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:122:20: error: type 'UnfairLock' does not conform to protocol 'RawMutex'
30 | /// A more specific kind of mutex that assume an underlying primitive and unbalanced lock/trylock/unlock operators
31 | public protocol RawMutex: ScopedMutex {
32 | associatedtype MutexPrimitive
| `- note: protocol requires nested type 'MutexPrimitive'
33 |
34 | /// The raw primitive is exposed as an "unsafe" public property for faster access in some cases
:
120 | /// NOTE: due to the behavior of the lock (non-FIFO) a single thread might drop and reacquire the lock without giving waiting threads a chance to resume (leading to potential starvation of waiters). For this reason, it is only recommended in situations where contention is expected to be rare or the interaction between contenders is otherwise known.
121 | @available(OSX 10.12, iOS 10, *)
122 | public final class UnfairLock: RawMutex {
| |- error: type 'UnfairLock' does not conform to protocol 'RawMutex'
| `- note: add stubs for conformance
123 | public typealias MutexPrimitive = os_unfair_lock
124 |
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:93:46: error: cannot convert value of type 'Int' to expected argument type 'Int32'
91 | switch type {
92 | case .normal:
93 | pthread_mutexattr_settype(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL)
| `- error: cannot convert value of type 'Int' to expected argument type 'Int32'
94 | case .recursive:
95 | pthread_mutexattr_settype(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE)
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:95:46: error: cannot convert value of type 'Int' to expected argument type 'Int32'
93 | pthread_mutexattr_settype(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL)
94 | case .recursive:
95 | pthread_mutexattr_settype(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE)
| `- error: cannot convert value of type 'Int' to expected argument type 'Int32'
96 | }
97 | guard pthread_mutex_init(&unsafeMutex, &attr) == 0 else {
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:132:9: error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_lock' in scope
130 |
131 | public func unbalancedLock() {
132 | os_unfair_lock_lock(&unsafeMutex)
| `- error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_lock' in scope
133 | }
134 |
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:136:16: error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_trylock' in scope
134 |
135 | public func unbalancedTryLock() -> Bool {
136 | return os_unfair_lock_trylock(&unsafeMutex)
| `- error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_trylock' in scope
137 | }
138 |
/host/spi-builder-workspace/Sources/Pooling/PThreadMutex.swift:140:9: error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_unlock' in scope
138 |
139 | public func unbalancedUnlock() {
140 | os_unfair_lock_unlock(&unsafeMutex)
| `- error: cannot find 'os_unfair_lock_unlock' in scope
141 | }
142 | }
BUILD FAILURE 6.1 linux